Showing 2 Result(s)

How can one justify Gita’s “selfless actions” when these are done for self-liberation? Aren’t these two contradictory?

 The error lies in the interpretation of the word “self less action” and “Being unattached to results”. The common interpretation of ‘selfless’ seems to be ‘unselfish’ or ‘noble’ or ‘without expecting anything in return’. Or an ‘action done for the greater good, and not for oneself’. And we often agree because it sounds so ‘nice’…so …

Is it really possible to enjoy life without ambition, desire, and attachment as religious philosophies suggest? Where will motivation to do anything come from?

The common answers found for this question usually swing between morality(“Because God said so”) and practicality(“We can try whatever is practically possible”) But that’s not needed. If you understand what the teachings really mean – it makes absolute, logical, meaningful sense.  The other good news is, you do not have to use labor, hardwork, ‘will power’ …